57.2 Conventions and notation
Let $k$ be a field. A $k$-linear triangulated category $\mathcal{T}$ is a triangulated category (Derived Categories, Section 13.3) which is endowed with a $k$-linear structure (Differential Graded Algebra, Section 22.24) such that the translation functors $[n] : \mathcal{T} \to \mathcal{T}$ are $k$-linear for all $n \in \mathbf{Z}$.
Let $k$ be a field. We denote $\text{Vect}_ k$ the category of $k$-vector spaces. For a $k$-vector space $V$ we denote $V^\vee $ the $k$-linear dual of $V$, i.e., $V^\vee = \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _ k(V, k)$.
Let $X$ be a scheme. We denote $D_{perf}(\mathcal{O}_ X)$ the full subcategory of $D(\mathcal{O}_ X)$ consisting of perfect complexes (Cohomology, Section 20.49). If $X$ is Noetherian then $D_{perf}(\mathcal{O}_ X) \subset D^ b_{\textit{Coh}}(\mathcal{O}_ X)$, see Derived Categories of Schemes, Lemma 36.11.6. If $X$ is Noetherian and regular, then $D_{perf}(\mathcal{O}_ X) = D^ b_{\textit{Coh}}(\mathcal{O}_ X)$, see Derived Categories of Schemes, Lemma 36.11.8.
Let $k$ be a field. Let $X$ and $Y$ be schemes over $k$. In this situation we will write $X \times Y$ instead of $X \times _{\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k)} Y$.
Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $X$, $Y$ be schemes over $S$. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a $\mathcal{O}_ X$-module and let $\mathcal{G}$ be a $\mathcal{O}_ Y$-module. We set
as $\mathcal{O}_{X \times _ S Y}$-modules. If $K \in D(\mathcal{O}_ X)$ and $M \in D(\mathcal{O}_ Y)$ then we set
as an object of $D(\mathcal{O}_{X \times _ S Y})$. Thus our notation is potentially ambiguous, but context should make it clear which of the two is meant.
Post a comment
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$
). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).
All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Comments (2)
Comment #5117 by J on
Comment #5324 by Johan on