The Stacks project

Lemma 37.66.4. Any quasi-affine morphism is ind-quasi-affine. Any immersion is ind-quasi-affine.

Proof. The first assertion is immediate from the definitions. In particular, affine morphisms, such as closed immersions, are ind-quasi-affine. Thus, by Lemma 37.66.3, it remains to show that an open immersion is ind-quasi-affine. This, however, is immediate from the definitions. $\square$

Comments (0)

There are also:

  • 2 comment(s) on Section 37.66: Ind-quasi-affine morphisms

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0F1W. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.



View Lemma 37.66.4 as pdf