Here is the definition.
Definition 10.67.1. Let $R$ be a ring. Let $M$ be an $R$-module.
The associated primes of $M$ which are not minimal among the associated primes of $M$ are called the embedded associated primes of $M$.
The embedded primes of $R$ are the embedded associated primes of $R$ as an $R$-module.
Here is a way to get rid of these.
Lemma 10.67.2. Let $R$ be a Noetherian ring. Let $M$ be a finite $R$-module. Consider the set of $R$-submodules This set has a maximal element $K$ and the quotient $M' = M/K$ has the following properties
$\text{Supp}(M) = \text{Supp}(M')$,
$M'$ has no embedded associated primes,
for any $f \in R$ which is contained in all embedded associated primes of $M$ we have $M_ f \cong M'_ f$.
\[ \{ K \subset M \mid \text{Supp}(K) \text{ nowhere dense in } \text{Supp}(M) \} . \]
Proof. We will use Lemma 10.63.5 and Proposition 10.63.6 without further mention. Let $\mathfrak q_1, \ldots , \mathfrak q_ t$ denote the minimal primes in the support of $M$. Let $\mathfrak p_1, \ldots , \mathfrak p_ s$ denote the embedded associated primes of $M$. Then $\text{Ass}(M) = \{ \mathfrak q_ j, \mathfrak p_ i\} $. Let
It is immediately seen to be a submodule. Since $M$ is finite over a Noetherian ring, we know $K$ is finite too. Hence $\text{Supp}(K)$ is nowhere dense in $\text{Supp}(M)$. Let $K' \subset M$ be another submodule with support nowhere dense in $\text{Supp}(M)$. This means that $K_{\mathfrak q_ j} = 0$. Hence if $m \in K'$, then $m$ maps to zero in $M_{\mathfrak q_ j}$ which in turn implies $(Rm)_{\mathfrak q_ j} = 0$. On the other hand we have $\text{Ass}(Rm) \subset \text{Ass}(M)$. Hence the support of $Rm$ is contained in $\bigcup V(\mathfrak p_ i)$. Therefore $m \in K$ and thus $K' \subset K$ as $m$ was arbitrary in $K'$.
Let $M' = M/K$. Since $K_{\mathfrak q_ j}=0$ we know $M'_{\mathfrak q_ j} = M_{\mathfrak q_ j}$ for all $j$. Hence $M$ and $M'$ have the same support.
Suppose $\mathfrak q = \text{Ann}(\overline{m}) \in \text{Ass}(M')$ where $\overline{m} \in M'$ is the image of $m \in M$. Then $m \not\in K$ and hence the support of $Rm$ must contain one of the $\mathfrak q_ j$. Since $M_{\mathfrak q_ j} = M'_{\mathfrak q_ j}$, we know $\overline{m}$ does not map to zero in $M'_{\mathfrak q_ j}$. Hence $\mathfrak q \subset \mathfrak q_ j$ (actually we have equality), which means that all the associated primes of $M'$ are not embedded.
Let $f$ be an element contained in all $\mathfrak p_ i$. Then $D(f) \cap \text{supp}(K) = 0$. Hence $M_ f = M'_ f$ because $K_ f = 0$. $\square$
Lemma 10.67.3. Let $R$ be a Noetherian ring. Let $M$ be a finite $R$-module. For any $f \in R$ we have $(M')_ f = (M_ f)'$ where $M \to M'$ and $M_ f \to (M_ f)'$ are the quotients constructed in Lemma 10.67.2.
Proof. Omitted. $\square$
Lemma 10.67.4. Let $R$ be a Noetherian ring. Let $M$ be a finite $R$-module without embedded associated primes. Let $I = \{ x \in R \mid xM = 0\} $. Then the ring $R/I$ has no embedded primes.
Proof. We may replace $R$ by $R/I$. Hence we may assume every nonzero element of $R$ acts nontrivially on $M$. By Lemma 10.40.5 this implies that $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R)$ equals the support of $M$. Suppose that $\mathfrak p$ is an embedded prime of $R$. Let $x \in R$ be an element whose annihilator is $\mathfrak p$. Consider the nonzero module $N = xM \subset M$. It is annihilated by $\mathfrak p$. Hence any associated prime $\mathfrak q$ of $N$ contains $\mathfrak p$ and is also an associated prime of $M$. Then $\mathfrak q$ would be an embedded associated prime of $M$ which contradicts the assumption of the lemma. $\square$
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).
All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Comments (0)