Lemma 37.79.1. Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes. Assume
$Y$ has an ample family of invertible modules,
there exists an $f$-ample invertible module on $X$.
Then $X$ has an ample family of invertible modules.
Lemma 37.79.1. Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes. Assume
$Y$ has an ample family of invertible modules,
there exists an $f$-ample invertible module on $X$.
Then $X$ has an ample family of invertible modules.
Proof. Let $\mathcal{L}$ be an $f$-ample invertible module on $X$. This in particular implies that $f$ is quasi-compact, see Morphisms, Definition 29.37.1. Since $Y$ is quasi-compact by Morphisms, Definition 29.12.1 we see that $X$ is quasi-compact (and hence $X$ itself satisfies the first condition of Morphisms, Definition 29.12.1). Let $x \in X$ with image $y \in Y$. By assumption (2) we can find an invertible $\mathcal{O}_ Y$-module $\mathcal{N}$ and a section $t \in \Gamma (Y, \mathcal{N})$ such that the locus $Y_ t$ where $t$ does not vanish is affine. Then $\mathcal{L}$ is ample over $f^{-1}(Y_ t) = X_{f^*t}$ and hence we can find a section $s \in \Gamma (X_{f^*t}, \mathcal{L})$ such that $(X_{f^*t})_ s$ is affine and contains $x$. By Properties, Lemma 28.17.2 for some $n \geq 0$ the product $(f^*t)^ n s$ extends to a section $s' \in \Gamma (X, f^*\mathcal{N}^{\otimes n} \otimes \mathcal{L})$. Then finally the section $s'' = f^* ts'$ of $f^*\mathcal{N}^{\otimes n + 1} \otimes \mathcal{L}$ vanishes at every point of $X \setminus X_{f^*t}$ hence we see that $X_{s''} = (X_{f^*t})_ s$ is affine as desired. $\square$
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$
). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).
All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Comments (0)