The Stacks project

29.47 Absolute weak normalization and seminormalization

Motivated by the results proved in the previous section we give the following definition.

Definition 29.47.1. Let $A$ be a ring.

  1. We say $A$ is seminormal if for all $x, y \in A$ with $x^3 = y^2$ there is a unique $a \in A$ with $x = a^2$ and $y = a^3$.

  2. We say $A$ is absolutely weakly normal if (a) $A$ is seminormal and (b) for any prime number $p$ and $x, y \in A$ with $p^ px = y^ p$ there is a unique $a \in A$ with $x = a^ p$ and $y = pa$.

An amusing observation, see [Costa], is that in the definition of seminormal rings it suffices1 to assume the existence of $a$. Absolutely weakly normal schemes were defined in [Appendix B, rydh_descent].

Lemma 29.47.2. Being seminormal or being absolutely weakly normal is a local property of rings, see Properties, Definition 28.4.1.

Proof. Suppose that $A$ is seminormal and $f \in A$. Let $x', y' \in A_ f$ with $(x')^3 = (y')^2$. Write $x' = x/f^{2n}$ and $y' = y/f^{3n}$ for some $n \geq 0$ and $x, y \in A$. After replacing $x, y$ by $f^{2m}x, f^{3m}y$ and $n$ by $n + m$, we see that $x^3 = y^2$ in $A$. Then we find a unique $a \in A$ with $x = a^2$ and $y = a^3$. Setting $a' = a/f^ n$ we get $x' = (a')^2$ and $y' = (a')^3$ as desired. Uniqueness of $a'$ follows from uniqueness of $a$. In exactly the same manner the reader shows that if $A$ is absolutely weakly normal, then $A_ f$ is absolutely weakly normal.

Assume $A$ is a ring and $f_1, \ldots , f_ n \in A$ generate the unit ideal. Assume $A_{f_ i}$ is seminormal for each $i$. Let $x, y \in A$ with $x^3 = y^2$. For each $i$ we find a unique $a_ i \in A_{f_ i}$ with $x = a_ i^2$ and $y = a_ i^3$ in $A_{f_ i}$. By the uniqueness and the result of the first paragraph (which tells us that $A_{f_ if_ j}$ is seminormal) we see that $a_ i$ and $a_ j$ map to the same element of $A_{f_ if_ j}$. By Algebra, Lemma 10.24.2 we find a unique $a \in A$ mapping to $a_ i$ in $A_{f_ i}$ for all $i$. Then $x = a^2$ and $y = a^3$ by the same token. Clearly this $a$ is unique. Thus $A$ is seminormal. If we assume $A_{f_ i}$ is absolutely weakly normal, then the exact same argument shows that $A$ is absolutely weakly normal. $\square$

Next we define seminormal schemes and absolutely weakly normal schemes.

Definition 29.47.3. Let $X$ be a scheme.

  1. We say $X$ is seminormal if every $x \in X$ has an affine open neighbourhood $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R) = U \subset X$ such that the ring $R$ is seminormal.

  2. We say $X$ is absolutely weakly normal if every $x \in X$ has an affine open neighbourhood $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R) = U \subset X$ such that the ring $R$ is absolutely weakly normal.

Here is the obligatory lemma.

Lemma 29.47.4. Let $X$ be a scheme. The following are equivalent:

  1. The scheme $X$ is seminormal.

  2. For every affine open $U \subset X$ the ring $\mathcal{O}_ X(U)$ is seminormal.

  3. There exists an affine open covering $X = \bigcup U_ i$ such that each $\mathcal{O}_ X(U_ i)$ is seminormal.

  4. There exists an open covering $X = \bigcup X_ j$ such that each open subscheme $X_ j$ is seminormal.

Moreover, if $X$ is seminormal then every open subscheme is seminormal. The same statements are true with “seminormal” replaced by “absolutely weakly normal”.

Proof. Combine Properties, Lemma 28.4.3 and Lemma 29.47.2. $\square$

Lemma 29.47.5. A seminormal scheme or ring is reduced. A fortiori the same is true for absolutely weakly normal schemes or rings.

Proof. Let $A$ be a ring. If $a \in A$ is nonzero but $a^2 = 0$, then $a^2 = 0^2$ and $a^3 = 0^3$ and hence $A$ is not seminormal. $\square$

Lemma 29.47.6. Let $A$ be a ring.

  1. The category of ring maps $A \to B$ inducing a universal homeomorphism on spectra has a final object $A \to A^{awn}$.

  2. Given $A \to B$ in the category of (1) the resulting map $B \to A^{awn}$ is an isomorphism if and only if $B$ is absolutely weakly normal.

  3. The category of ring maps $A \to B$ inducing isomorphisms on residue fields and a universal homeomorphism on spectra has a final object $A \to A^{sn}$.

  4. Given $A \to B$ in the category of (3) the resulting map $B \to A^{sn}$ is an isomorphism if and only if $B$ is seminormal.

For any ring map $\varphi : A \to A'$ there are unique maps $\varphi ^{awn} : A^{awn} \to (A')^{awn}$ and $\varphi ^{sn} : A^{sn} \to (A')^{sn}$ compatible with $\varphi $.

Proof. We prove (1) and (2) and we omit the proof of (3) and (4) and the final statement. Consider the category of $A$-algebras of the form

\[ B = A[x_1, \ldots , x_ n]/J \]

where $J$ is a finitely generated ideal such that $A \to B$ defines a universal homeomorphism on spectra. We claim this category is directed (Categories, Definition 4.19.1). Namely, given

\[ B = A[x_1, \ldots , x_ n]/J \quad \text{and}\quad B' = A[x_1, \ldots , x_{n'}]/J' \]

then we can consider

\[ B'' = A[x_1, \ldots , x_{n + n'}]/J'' \]

where $J''$ is generated by the elements of $J$ and the elements $f(x_{n + 1}, \ldots , x_{n + n'})$ where $f \in J'$. Then we have $A$-algebra homomorphisms $B \to B''$ and $B' \to B''$ which induce an isomorphism $B \otimes _ A B' \to B''$. It follows from Lemmas 29.45.2 and 29.45.3 that $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B'') \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A)$ is a universal homeomorphism and hence $A \to B''$ is in our category. Finally, given $\varphi , \varphi ' : B \to B'$ in our category with $B$ as displayed above, then we consider the quotient $B''$ of $B'$ by the ideal generated by $\varphi (x_ i) - \varphi '(x_ i)$, $i = 1, \ldots , n$. Since $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B') = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B)$ we see that $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B'') \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B')$ is a bijective closed immersion hence a universal homeomorphism. Thus $B''$ is in our category and $\varphi , \varphi '$ are equalized by $B' \to B''$. This completes the proof of our claim. We set

\[ A^{awn} = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits B \]

where the colimit is over the category just described. Observe that $A \to A^{awn}$ induces a universal homeomorphism on spectra by Lemma 29.46.2 (this is where we use the category is directed).

Given a ring map $A \to B$ of finite presentation inducing a universal homeomorphism on spectra, we get a canonical map $B \to A^{awn}$ by the very construction of $A^{awn}$. Since every $A \to B$ as in (1) is a filtered colimit of $A \to B$ as in (1) of finite presentation (Lemma 29.46.11), we see that $A \to A^{awn}$ is final in the category (1).

Let $x, y \in A^{awn}$ be elements such that $x^3 = y^2$. Then $A^{awn} \to A^{awn}[t]/(t^2 - x, t^3 - y)$ induces a universal homeomorphism on spectra by Lemma 29.46.10. Thus $A \to A^{awn}[t]/(t^2 - x, t^3 - y)$ is in the category (1) and we obtain a unique $A$-algebra map $A^{awn}[t]/(t^2 - x, t^3 - y) \to A^{awn}$. The image $a \in A^{awn}$ of $t$ is therefore the unique element such that $a^2 = x$ and $a^3 = y$ in $A^{awn}$. In exactly the same manner, given a prime $p$ and $x, y \in A^{awn}$ with $p^ px = y^ p$ we find a unique $a \in A^{awn}$ with $a^ p = x$ and $pq = y$. Thus $A^{awn}$ is absolutely weakly normal by definition.

Finally, let $A \to B$ be in the category (1) with $B$ absolutely weakly normal. Since $A^{awn} \to B^{awn}$ induces a universal homeomorphism on spectra and since $A^{awn}$ is reduced (Lemma 29.47.5) we find $A^{awn} \subset B^{awn}$ (see Algebra, Lemma 10.30.6). If this inclusion is not an equality, then Lemma 29.46.6 implies there is an element $b \in B^{awn}$, $b \not\in A^{awn}$ such that either $b^2, b^3 \in A^{awn}$ or $pb, b^ p \in A^{awn}$ for some prime number $p$. However, by the existence and uniqueness in Definition 29.47.1 this forces $b \in A^{awn}$ and hence we obtain the contradiction that finishes the proof. $\square$

Lemma 29.47.7. Let $X$ be a scheme.

  1. The category of universal homeomorphisms $Y \to X$ has an initial object $X^{awn} \to X$.

  2. Given $Y \to X$ in the category of (1) the resulting morphism $X^{awn} \to Y$ is an isomorphism if and only if $Y$ is absolutely weakly normal.

  3. The category of universal homeomorphisms $Y \to X$ which induce ismomorphisms on residue fields has an initial object $X^{sn} \to X$.

  4. Given $Y \to X$ in the category of (3) the resulting morphism $X^{sn} \to Y$ is an isomorphism if and only if $Y$ is seminormal.

For any morphism $h : X' \to X$ of schemes there are unique morphisms $h^{awn} : (X')^{awn} \to X^{awn}$ and $h^{sn} : (X')^{sn} \to X^{sn}$ compatible with $h$.

Proof. We will prove (1) and (2) and omit the proof of (3) and (4). Let $h : X' \to X$ be a morphism of schemes. If (1) holds for $X$ and $X'$, then $X' \times _ X X^{awn} \to X'$ is a universal homeomorphism and hence we get a unique morphism $(X')^{awn} \to X' \times _ X X^{awn}$ over $X'$ by the universal property of $(X')^{awn} \to X'$. Composed with the projection $X' \times _ X X^{awn} \to X^{awn}$ we obtain $h^{awn}$. If in addition (2) holds for $X$ and $X'$ and $h$ is an open immersion, then $X' \times _ X X^{awn}$ is absolutely weakly normal (Lemma 29.47.4) and we deduce that $(X')^{awn} \to X' \times _ X X^{awn}$ is an isomorphism.

Recall that any universal homeomorphism is affine, see Lemma 29.45.4. Thus if $X$ is affine then (1) and (2) follow immediately from Lemma 29.47.6. Let $X$ be a scheme and let $\mathcal{B}$ be the set of affine opens of $X$. For each $U \in \mathcal{B}$ we obtain $U^{awn} \to U$ and for $V \subset U$, $V, U \in \mathcal{B}$ we obtain a canonical isomorphism $\rho _{V, U} : V^{awn} \to V \times _ U U^{awn}$ by the discussion in the previous paragraph. Thus by relative glueing (Constructions, Lemma 27.2.1) we obtain a morphism $X^{awn} \to X$ which restricts to $U^{awn}$ over $U$ compatibly with the $\rho _{V, U}$. Next, let $Y \to X$ be a universal homeomorphism. Then $U \times _ X Y \to U$ is a universal homeomorphism for $U \in \mathcal{B}$ and we obtain a unique morphism $g_ U : U^{awn} \to U \times _ X Y$ over $U$. These $g_ U$ are compatible with the morphisms $\rho _{V, U}$; details omitted. Hence there is a unique morphism $g : X^{awn} \to Y$ over $X$ agreeing with $g_ U$ over $U$, see Constructions, Remark 27.2.3. This proves (1) for $X$. Part (2) follows because it holds affine locally. $\square$

Definition 29.47.8. Let $X$ be a scheme.

  1. The morphism $X^{sn} \to X$ constructed in Lemma 29.47.7 is the seminormalization of $X$.

  2. The morphism $X^{awn} \to X$ constructed in Lemma 29.47.7 is the absolute weak normalization of $X$.

To be sure, the seminormalization $X^{sn}$ of $X$ is a seminormal scheme and the absolute weak normalization $X^{awn}$ is an absolutely weakly normal scheme. Moreover, for any morphism $h : Y \to X$ of schemes we obtain a canonical commutative diagram

\[ \xymatrix{ Y^{awn} \ar[d]^{h^{awn}} \ar[r] & Y^{sn} \ar[d]^{h^{sn}} \ar[r] & Y \ar[d]^ h \\ X^{awn} \ar[r] & X^{sn} \ar[r] & X } \]

of schemes; the arrows $h^{sn}$ and $h^{awn}$ are the unique ones compatible with $h$.

Lemma 29.47.9. Let $X$ be a scheme. The following are equivalent

  1. $X$ is seminormal,

  2. $X$ is equal to its own seminormalization, i.e., the morphism $X^{sn} \to X$ is an isomorphism,

  3. if $\pi : Y \to X$ is a universal homeomorphism inducing isomorphisms on residue fields with $Y$ reduced, then $\pi $ is an isomorphism.

Proof. The equivalence of (1) and (2) is clear from Lemma 29.47.7. If (3) holds, then $X^{sn} \to X$ is an isomorphism and we see that (2) holds.

Assume (2) holds and let $\pi : Y \to X$ be a universal homeomorphism inducing isomorphisms on residue fields with $Y$ reduced. Then there exists a factorization $X \to Y \to X$ of $\text{id}_ X$ by Lemma 29.47.7. Then $X \to Y$ is a closed immersion (by Schemes, Lemma 26.21.11 and the fact that $\pi $ is separated for example by Lemma 29.10.3). Since $X \to Y$ is also a bijection on points, the reducedness of $Y$ shows that it has to be an isomorphism. This finishes the proof. $\square$

Lemma 29.47.10. Let $X$ be a scheme. The following are equivalent

  1. $X$ is absolutely weakly normal,

  2. $X$ is equal to its own absolute weak normalization, i.e., the morphism $X^{awn} \to X$ is an isomorphism,

  3. if $\pi : Y \to X$ is a universal homeomorphism with $Y$ reduced, then $\pi $ is an isomorphism.

Proof. This is proved in exactly the same manner as Lemma 29.47.9. $\square$

[1] Let $A$ be a ring such that for all $x, y \in A$ with $x^3 = y^2$ there is an $a \in A$ with $x = a^2$ and $y = a^3$. Then $A$ is reduced: if $x^2 = 0$, then $x^2 = x^3$ and hence there exists an $a$ such that $x = a^3$ and $x = a^2$. Then $x = a^3 = ax = a^4 = x^2 = 0$. Finally, if $a_1^2 = a_2^2$ and $a_1^3 = a_2^3$ for $a_1, a_2$ in a reduced ring, then $(a_1 - a_2)^3 = a_1^3 - 3a_1^2a_2 +3a_1a_2^2 - a_2^3 = (1 - 3 + 3 - 1)a_1^3 = 0$ and hence $a_1 = a_2$.

Comments (2)

Comment #8600 by on

In Lemma 29.47.9(3), do you mean that is a universal heomomorphism instead of a universal homomorphism? Similarly for Lemma 29.47.10(3).

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0EUK. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.



View Section 29.47 as pdf