Lemma 76.54.1. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $\{ f_ i : X_ i \to X\} $ be an fpqc covering of algebraic spaces over $S$. Let $E \in D_\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X)$. Let $m \in \mathbf{Z}$. Then $E$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent if and only if each $Lf_ i^*E$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent.
Proof. Pullback always preserves $m$-pseudo-coherence, see Cohomology on Sites, Lemma 21.45.3. Thus it suffices to assume $Lf_ i^*E$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent and to prove that $E$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent. Then first we may assume $X_ i$ is a scheme for all $i$, see Topologies on Spaces, Lemma 73.9.5. Next, choose a surjective étale morphism $U \to X$ where $U$ is a scheme. Then $U_ i = U \times _ X X_ i$ is a scheme and we obtain an fpqc covering $\{ U_ i \to U\} $ of schemes, see Topologies on Spaces, Lemma 73.9.4. We know the result is true for $\{ U_ i \to U\} _{i \in I}$ by the case for schemes, see Derived Categories of Schemes, Lemma 36.12.2. On the other hand, the restriction $E|_ U$ comes from an object of $D_\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ U)$ (defined using the Zariski topology and the “usual” structure sheaf of $U$), see Derived Categories of Spaces, Lemma 75.4.2. The lemma follows as the two notions of pseudo-coherent (étale and Zariski) agree by Derived Categories of Spaces, Lemma 75.13.2. $\square$
Post a comment
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$
). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).
All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Comments (0)