Lemma 33.30.1. Let $A \to B$ be a faithfully flat ring map. Let $X$ be a quasi-compact and quasi-separated scheme over $A$. Let $\mathcal{L}$ be an invertible $\mathcal{O}_ X$-module whose pullback to $X_ B$ is trivial. Then $H^0(X, \mathcal{L})$ and $H^0(X, \mathcal{L}^{\otimes -1})$ are invertible $H^0(X, \mathcal{O}_ X)$-modules and the multiplication map induces an isomorphism
Proof. Denote $\mathcal{L}_ B$ the pullback of $\mathcal{L}$ to $X_ B$. Choose an isomorphism $\mathcal{L}_ B \to \mathcal{O}_{X_ B}$. Set $R = H^0(X, \mathcal{O}_ X)$, $M = H^0(X, \mathcal{L})$ and think of $M$ as an $R$-module. For every quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_ X$-module $\mathcal{F}$ with pullback $\mathcal{F}_ B$ on $X_ B$ there is a canonical isomorphism $H^0(X_ B, \mathcal{F}_ B) = H^0(X, \mathcal{F}) \otimes _ A B$, see Cohomology of Schemes, Lemma 30.5.2. Thus we have
Since $R \to R \otimes _ A B$ is faithfully flat (as the base change of the faithfully flat map $A \to B$), we conclude that $M$ is an invertible $R$-module by Algebra, Proposition 10.83.3. Similarly $N = H^0(X, \mathcal{L}^{\otimes -1})$ is an invertible $R$-module. To see that the statement on tensor products is true, use that it is true after pulling back to $X_ B$ and faithful flatness of $R \to R \otimes _ A B$. Some details omitted. $\square$
Post a comment
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$
). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).
All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Comments (0)