We interrupt the flow of the exposition to talk a little bit about derived completion in the setting of quasi-coherent modules on schemes and to use this to give a somewhat different proof of the theorem on formal functions. We give some pointers to the literature in Remark 52.7.4.
Lemma 52.6.19 is a (very formal) derived version of the theorem on formal functions (Cohomology of Schemes, Theorem 30.20.5). To make this more explicit, suppose $f : X \to S$ is a morphism of schemes, $\mathcal{I} \subset \mathcal{O}_ S$ is a quasi-coherent sheaf of ideals of finite type, and $\mathcal{F}$ is a quasi-coherent sheaf on $X$. Then the lemma says that
where $\mathcal{F}^\wedge $ is the derived completion of $\mathcal{F}$ with respect to $f^{-1}\mathcal{I} \cdot \mathcal{O}_ X$ and the right hand side is the derived completion of $Rf_*\mathcal{F}$ with respect to $\mathcal{I}$. To see that this gives back the theorem on formal functions we have to do a bit of work.
Lemma 52.7.1. Let $X$ be a locally Noetherian scheme. Let $\mathcal{I} \subset \mathcal{O}_ X$ be a quasi-coherent sheaf of ideals. Let $K$ be a pseudo-coherent object of $D(\mathcal{O}_ X)$ with derived completion $K^\wedge $. Then for any affine open $U \subset X$ where $I = \mathcal{I}(U)$ and where on the right we have the derived completion with respect to $I$.
\[ H^ p(U, K^\wedge ) = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits H^ p(U, K)/I^ nH^ p(U, K) = H^ p(U, K)^\wedge \]
Proof. Write $U = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A)$. The ring $A$ is Noetherian and hence $I \subset A$ is finitely generated. Then we have
by Remark 52.6.21. Now $R\Gamma (U, K)$ is a pseudo-coherent complex of $A$-modules (Derived Categories of Schemes, Lemma 36.10.2). By More on Algebra, Lemma 15.94.4 we conclude that the $p$th cohomology module of $R\Gamma (U, K^\wedge )$ is equal to the $I$-adic completion of $H^ p(U, K)$. This proves the first equality. The second (less important) equality follows immediately from a second application of the lemma just used. $\square$
Lemma 52.7.2. Let $X$ be a locally Noetherian scheme. Let $\mathcal{I} \subset \mathcal{O}_ X$ be a quasi-coherent sheaf of ideals. Let $K$ be an object of $D(\mathcal{O}_ X)$. Then
the derived completion $K^\wedge $ is equal to $R\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits (K \otimes _{\mathcal{O}_ X}^\mathbf {L} \mathcal{O}_ X/\mathcal{I}^ n)$.
Let $K$ is a pseudo-coherent object of $D(\mathcal{O}_ X)$. Then
the cohomology sheaf $H^ q(K^\wedge )$ is equal to $\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits H^ q(K)/\mathcal{I}^ nH^ q(K)$.
Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a coherent $\mathcal{O}_ X$-module1. Then
the derived completion $\mathcal{F}^\wedge $ is equal to $\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits \mathcal{F}/\mathcal{I}^ n\mathcal{F}$,
$\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits \mathcal{F}/I^ n \mathcal{F} = R\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits \mathcal{F}/I^ n \mathcal{F}$,
$H^ p(U, \mathcal{F}^\wedge ) = 0$ for $p \not= 0$ for all affine opens $U \subset X$.
Proof. Proof of (1). There is a canonical map
see Remark 52.6.13. Derived completion commutes with passing to open subschemes (Remark 52.6.14). Formation of $R\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits $ commutes with passing to open subschemes. It follows that to check our map is an isomorphism, we may work locally. Thus we may assume $X = U = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A)$. Say $I = (f_1, \ldots , f_ r)$. Let $K_ n = K(A, f_1^ n, \ldots , f_ r^ n)$ be the Koszul complex. By More on Algebra, Lemma 15.94.1 we have seen that the pro-systems $\{ K_ n\} $ and $\{ A/I^ n\} $ of $D(A)$ are isomorphic. Using the equivalence $D(A) = D_{\mathit{QCoh}}(\mathcal{O}_ X)$ of Derived Categories of Schemes, Lemma 36.3.5 we see that the pro-systems $\{ K(\mathcal{O}_ X, f_1^ n, \ldots , f_ r^ n)\} $ and $\{ \mathcal{O}_ X/\mathcal{I}^ n\} $ are isomorphic in $D(\mathcal{O}_ X)$. This proves the second equality in
The first equality is Lemma 52.6.9.
Assume $K$ is pseudo-coherent. For $U \subset X$ affine open we have $H^ q(U, K^\wedge ) = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits H^ q(U, K)/\mathcal{I}^ n(U)H^ q(U, K)$ by Lemma 52.7.1. As this is true for every $U$ we see that $H^ q(K^\wedge ) = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits H^ q(K)/\mathcal{I}^ nH^ q(K)$ as sheaves. This proves (2).
Part (3) is a special case of (2). Parts (4) and (5) follow from Derived Categories of Schemes, Lemma 36.3.2. $\square$
Lemma 52.7.3. Let $A$ be a Noetherian ring and let $I \subset A$ be an ideal. Let $X$ be a Noetherian scheme over $A$. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a coherent $\mathcal{O}_ X$-module. Assume that $H^ p(X, \mathcal{F})$ is a finite $A$-module for all $p$. Then there are short exact sequences of $A$-modules where $H^ p(X, \mathcal{F})^\wedge $ is the usual $I$-adic completion. If $f$ is proper, then the $R^1\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits $ term is zero.
\[ 0 \to R^1\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits H^{p - 1}(X, \mathcal{F}/I^ n\mathcal{F}) \to H^ p(X, \mathcal{F})^\wedge \to \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits H^ p(X, \mathcal{F}/I^ n\mathcal{F}) \to 0 \]
Proof. Consider the two spectral sequences of Lemma 52.6.20. The first degenerates by More on Algebra, Lemma 15.94.4. We obtain $H^ p(X, \mathcal{F})^\wedge $ in degree $p$. This is where we use the assumption that $H^ p(X, \mathcal{F})$ is a finite $A$-module. The second degenerates because
is a sheaf by Lemma 52.7.2. We obtain $H^ p(X, \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits \mathcal{F}/I^ n\mathcal{F})$ in degree $p$. Since $R\Gamma (X, -)$ commutes with derived limits (Injectives, Lemma 19.13.6) we also get
By More on Algebra, Remark 15.87.6 we obtain exact sequences
of $A$-modules. Combining the above we get the first statement of the lemma. The vanishing of the $R^1\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits $ term follows from Cohomology of Schemes, Lemma 30.20.4. $\square$
Remark 52.7.4. Here are some references to discussions of related material the literature. It seems that a “derived formal functions theorem” for proper maps goes back to [Theorem 6.3.1, lurie-thesis]. There is the discussion in [dag12], especially Chapter 4 which discusses the affine story, see More on Algebra, Section 15.91. In [Section 2.9, G-R] one finds a discussion of proper base change and derived completion using (ind) coherent modules. An analogue of (52.7.0.1) for complexes of quasi-coherent modules can be found as [Theorem 6.5, HL-P]
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).
All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Comments (2)
Comment #531 by Keenan Kidwell on
Comment #533 by Johan on