Lemma 32.13.5. Assumptions and notation as in Situation 32.8.1. Let $\mathcal{F}_0$ be a quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_{X_0}$-module. Denote $\mathcal{F}$ and $\mathcal{F}_ i$ the pullbacks of $\mathcal{F}_0$ to $X$ and $X_ i$. Assume
$f_0$ is locally of finite type,
$\mathcal{F}_0$ is of finite type,
the scheme theoretic support of $\mathcal{F}$ is proper over $Y$.
Then the scheme theoretic support of $\mathcal{F}_ i$ is proper over $Y_ i$ for some $i$.
Proof. We may replace $X_0$ by the scheme theoretic support of $\mathcal{F}_0$. By Morphisms, Lemma 29.5.3 this guarantees that $X_ i$ is the support of $\mathcal{F}_ i$ and $X$ is the support of $\mathcal{F}$. Then, if $Z \subset X$ denotes the scheme theoretic support of $\mathcal{F}$, we see that $Z \to X$ is a universal homeomorphism. We conclude that $X \to Y$ is proper as this is true for $Z \to Y$ by assumption, see Morphisms, Lemma 29.41.9. By Lemma 32.13.1 we see that $X_ i \to Y$ is proper for some $i$. Then it follows that the scheme theoretic support $Z_ i$ of $\mathcal{F}_ i$ is proper over $Y$ by Morphisms, Lemmas 29.41.6 and 29.41.4. $\square$
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).
All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Comments (0)