Lemma 97.12.7. Let $F : \mathcal{X} \to \mathcal{Y}$ be a $1$-morphism of stacks in groupoids over $(\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf}$. Assume $F$ is representable by algebraic spaces and locally of finite presentation. Then
is limit preserving on objects.
Lemma 97.12.7. Let $F : \mathcal{X} \to \mathcal{Y}$ be a $1$-morphism of stacks in groupoids over $(\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf}$. Assume $F$ is representable by algebraic spaces and locally of finite presentation. Then
is limit preserving on objects.
Proof. This means we have to show the following: Given
an affine scheme $U = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits _ i U_ i$ which is written as the directed limit of affine schemes $U_ i$ over $S$,
an object $y_ i$ of $\mathcal{Y}$ over $U_ i$ for some $i$, and
an object $\Xi = (U, Z, y, x, \alpha )$ of $\mathcal{H}_ d(\mathcal{X}/\mathcal{Y})$ over $U$ such that $y = y_ i|_ U$,
then there exists an $i' \geq i$ and an object $\Xi _{i'} = (U_{i'}, Z_{i'}, y_{i'}, x_{i'}, \alpha _{i'})$ of $\mathcal{H}_ d(\mathcal{X}/\mathcal{Y})$ over $U_{i'}$ with $\Xi _{i'}|_ U = \Xi $ and $y_{i'} = y_ i|_{U_{i'}}$. Namely, the last two equalities will take care of the commutativity of (97.5.0.1).
Let $X_{y_ i} \to U_ i$ be an algebraic space representing the $2$-fibre product
Note that $X_{y_ i} \to U_ i$ is locally of finite presentation by our assumption on $F$. Write $\Xi $. It is clear that $\xi = (Z, Z \to U_ i, x, \alpha )$ is an object of the $2$-fibre product displayed above, hence $\xi $ gives rise to a morphism $f_\xi : Z \to X_{y_ i}$ of algebraic spaces over $U_ i$ (since $X_{y_ i}$ is the functor of isomorphisms classes of objects of $(\mathit{Sch}/U_ i)_{fppf} \times _{y, \mathcal{Y}, F} \mathcal{X}$, see Algebraic Stacks, Lemma 94.8.2). By Limits, Lemmas 32.10.1 and 32.8.8 there exists an $i' \geq i$ and a finite locally free morphism $Z_{i'} \to U_{i'}$ of degree $d$ whose base change to $U$ is $Z$. By Limits of Spaces, Proposition 70.3.10 we may, after replacing $i'$ by a bigger index, assume there exists a morphism $f_{i'} : Z_{i'} \to X_{y_ i}$ such that
is commutative. We set $\Xi _{i'} = (U_{i'}, Z_{i'}, y_{i'}, x_{i'}, \alpha _{i'})$ where
$y_{i'}$ is the object of $\mathcal{Y}$ over $U_{i'}$ which is the pullback of $y_ i$ to $U_{i'}$,
$x_{i'}$ is the object of $\mathcal{X}$ over $Z_{i'}$ corresponding via the $2$-Yoneda lemma to the $1$-morphism
where the middle arrow is the equivalence which defines $X_{y_ i}$ (notation as in Algebraic Stacks, Sections 94.8 and 94.7).
$\alpha _{i'} : y_{i'}|_{Z_{i'}} \to F(x_{i'})$ is the isomorphism coming from the $2$-commutativity of the diagram
Recall that $f_\xi : Z \to X_{y_ i}$ was the morphism corresponding to the object $\xi = (Z, Z \to U_ i, x, \alpha )$ of $(\mathit{Sch}/U_ i)_{fppf} \times _{y_ i, \mathcal{Y}, F} \mathcal{X}$ over $Z$. By construction $f_{i'}$ is the morphism corresponding to the object $\xi _{i'} = (Z_{i'}, Z_{i'} \to U_ i, x_{i'}, \alpha _{i'})$. As $f_\xi = f_{i'} \circ (Z \to Z_{i'})$ we see that the object $\xi _{i'} = (Z_{i'}, Z_{i'} \to U_ i, x_{i'}, \alpha _{i'})$ pulls back to $\xi $ over $Z$. Thus $x_{i'}$ pulls back to $x$ and $\alpha _{i'}$ pulls back to $\alpha $. This means that $\Xi _{i'}$ pulls back to $\Xi $ over $U$ and we win. $\square$
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$
). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).
All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Comments (0)