Lemma 66.31.1. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $X$ be an algebraic space over $S$. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_ X$-module. The following are equivalent
for some scheme $U$ and surjective étale morphism $U \to X$ the restriction $\mathcal{F}|_ U$ is locally projective on $U$, and
for any scheme $U$ and any étale morphism $U \to X$ the restriction $\mathcal{F}|_ U$ is locally projective on $U$.
Proof. Let $U \to X$ be as in (1) and let $V \to X$ be étale where $V$ is a scheme. Then $\{ U \times _ X V \to V\} $ is an fppf covering of schemes. Hence if $\mathcal{F}|_ U$ is locally projective, then $\mathcal{F}|_{U \times _ X V}$ is locally projective (see Properties, Lemma 28.21.3) and hence $\mathcal{F}|_ V$ is locally projective, see Descent, Lemma 35.7.7. $\square$
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).
All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Comments (0)