Lemma 21.12.1. Let $(\mathcal{C}, \mathcal{O})$ be a ringed site. An injective sheaf of modules is also injective as an object in the category $\textit{PMod}(\mathcal{O})$.
21.12 Cohomology of modules
Everything that was said for cohomology of abelian sheaves goes for cohomology of modules, since the two agree.
Proof. Apply Homology, Lemma 12.29.1 to the categories $\mathcal{A} = \textit{Mod}(\mathcal{O})$, $\mathcal{B} = \textit{PMod}(\mathcal{O})$, the inclusion functor and sheafification. (See Modules on Sites, Section 18.11 to see that all assumptions of the lemma are satisfied.) $\square$
Lemma 21.12.2. Let $(\mathcal{C}, \mathcal{O})$ be a ringed site. Consider the functor $i : \textit{Mod}(\mathcal{C}) \to \textit{PMod}(\mathcal{C})$. It is a left exact functor with right derived functors given by see discussion in Section 21.7.
\[ R^ pi(\mathcal{F}) = \underline{H}^ p(\mathcal{F}) : U \longmapsto H^ p(U, \mathcal{F}) \]
Proof. It is clear that $i$ is left exact. Choose an injective resolution $\mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{I}^\bullet $ in $\textit{Mod}(\mathcal{O})$. By definition $R^ pi$ is the $p$th cohomology presheaf of the complex $\mathcal{I}^\bullet $. In other words, the sections of $R^ pi(\mathcal{F})$ over an object $U$ of $\mathcal{C}$ are given by
\[ \frac{\mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(\mathcal{I}^ n(U) \to \mathcal{I}^{n + 1}(U))}{\mathop{\mathrm{Im}}(\mathcal{I}^{n - 1}(U) \to \mathcal{I}^ n(U))}. \]
which is the definition of $H^ p(U, \mathcal{F})$. $\square$
Lemma 21.12.3. Let $(\mathcal{C}, \mathcal{O})$ be a ringed site. Let $\mathcal{U} = \{ U_ i \to U\} _{i \in I}$ be a covering of $\mathcal{C}$. Let $\mathcal{I}$ be an injective $\mathcal{O}$-module, i.e., an injective object of $\textit{Mod}(\mathcal{O})$. Then
\[ \check{H}^ p(\mathcal{U}, \mathcal{I}) = \left\{ \begin{matrix} \mathcal{I}(U)
& \text{if}
& p = 0
\\ 0
& \text{if}
& p > 0
\end{matrix} \right. \]
Proof. Lemma 21.9.3 gives the first equality in the following sequence of equalities
\begin{align*} \check{\mathcal{C}}^\bullet (\mathcal{U}, \mathcal{I}) & = \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _{\textit{PAb}(\mathcal{C})}( \mathbf{Z}_{\mathcal{U}, \bullet }, \mathcal{I}) \\ & = \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _{\textit{PMod}(\mathbf{Z})}( \mathbf{Z}_{\mathcal{U}, \bullet }, \mathcal{I}) \\ & = \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _{\textit{PMod}(\mathcal{O})}( \mathbf{Z}_{\mathcal{U}, \bullet } \otimes _{p, \mathbf{Z}} \mathcal{O}, \mathcal{I}) \end{align*}
The third equality by Modules on Sites, Lemma 18.9.2. By Lemma 21.12.1 we see that $\mathcal{I}$ is an injective object in $\textit{PMod}(\mathcal{O})$. Hence $\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{\textit{PMod}(\mathcal{O})}(-, \mathcal{I})$ is an exact functor. By Lemma 21.9.5 we see the vanishing of higher Čech cohomology groups. For the zeroth see Lemma 21.8.2. $\square$
Lemma 21.12.4. Let $\mathcal{C}$ be a site. Let $\mathcal{O}$ be a sheaf of rings on $\mathcal{C}$. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be an $\mathcal{O}$-module, and denote $\mathcal{F}_{ab}$ the underlying sheaf of abelian groups. Then we have and for any object $U$ of $\mathcal{C}$ we also have Here the left hand side is cohomology computed in $\textit{Ab}(\mathcal{C})$ and the right hand side is cohomology computed in $\textit{Mod}(\mathcal{O})$.
\[ H^ i(\mathcal{C}, \mathcal{F}_{ab}) = H^ i(\mathcal{C}, \mathcal{F}) \]
\[ H^ i(U, \mathcal{F}_{ab}) = H^ i(U, \mathcal{F}). \]
Proof. By Derived Categories, Lemma 13.20.4 the $\delta $-functor $(\mathcal{F} \mapsto H^ p(U, \mathcal{F}))_{p \geq 0}$ is universal. The functor $\textit{Mod}(\mathcal{O}) \to \textit{Ab}(\mathcal{C})$, $\mathcal{F} \mapsto \mathcal{F}_{ab}$ is exact. Hence $(\mathcal{F} \mapsto H^ p(U, \mathcal{F}_{ab}))_{p \geq 0}$ is a $\delta $-functor also. Suppose we show that $(\mathcal{F} \mapsto H^ p(U, \mathcal{F}_{ab}))_{p \geq 0}$ is also universal. This will imply the second statement of the lemma by uniqueness of universal $\delta $-functors, see Homology, Lemma 12.12.5. Since $\textit{Mod}(\mathcal{O})$ has enough injectives, it suffices to show that $H^ i(U, \mathcal{I}_{ab}) = 0$ for any injective object $\mathcal{I}$ in $\textit{Mod}(\mathcal{O})$, see Homology, Lemma 12.12.4.
Let $\mathcal{I}$ be an injective object of $\textit{Mod}(\mathcal{O})$. Apply Lemma 21.10.9 with $\mathcal{F} = \mathcal{I}$, $\mathcal{B} = \mathcal{C}$ and $\text{Cov} = \text{Cov}_\mathcal {C}$. Assumption (3) of that lemma holds by Lemma 21.12.3. Hence we see that $H^ i(U, \mathcal{I}_{ab}) = 0$ for every object $U$ of $\mathcal{C}$.
If $\mathcal{C}$ has a final object then this also implies the first equality. If not, then according to Sites, Lemma 7.29.5 we see that the ringed topos $(\mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C}), \mathcal{O})$ is equivalent to a ringed topos where the underlying site does have a final object. Hence the lemma follows. $\square$
Lemma 21.12.5. Let $\mathcal{C}$ be a site. Let $I$ be a set. For $i \in I$ let $\mathcal{F}_ i$ be an abelian sheaf on $\mathcal{C}$. Let $U \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C})$. The canonical map is an isomorphism for $p = 0$ and injective for $p = 1$.
\[ H^ p(U, \prod \nolimits _{i \in I} \mathcal{F}_ i) \longrightarrow \prod \nolimits _{i \in I} H^ p(U, \mathcal{F}_ i) \]
Proof. The statement for $p = 0$ is true because the product of sheaves is equal to the product of the underlying presheaves, see Sites, Lemma 7.10.1. Proof for $p = 1$. Set $\mathcal{F} = \prod \mathcal{F}_ i$. Let $\xi \in H^1(U, \mathcal{F})$ map to zero in $\prod H^1(U, \mathcal{F}_ i)$. By locality of cohomology, see Lemma 21.7.3, there exists a covering $\mathcal{U} = \{ U_ j \to U\} $ such that $\xi |_{U_ j} = 0$ for all $j$. By Lemma 21.10.4 this means $\xi $ comes from an element $\check\xi \in \check H^1(\mathcal{U}, \mathcal{F})$. Since the maps $\check H^1(\mathcal{U}, \mathcal{F}_ i) \to H^1(U, \mathcal{F}_ i)$ are injective for all $i$ (by Lemma 21.10.4), and since the image of $\xi $ is zero in $\prod H^1(U, \mathcal{F}_ i)$ we see that the image $\check\xi _ i = 0$ in $\check H^1(\mathcal{U}, \mathcal{F}_ i)$. However, since $\mathcal{F} = \prod \mathcal{F}_ i$ we see that $\check{\mathcal{C}}^\bullet (\mathcal{U}, \mathcal{F})$ is the product of the complexes $\check{\mathcal{C}}^\bullet (\mathcal{U}, \mathcal{F}_ i)$, hence by Homology, Lemma 12.32.1 we conclude that $\check\xi = 0$ as desired. $\square$
Lemma 21.12.6. Let $(\mathcal{C}, \mathcal{O})$ be a ringed site. Let $a : U' \to U$ be a monomorphism in $\mathcal{C}$. Then for any injective $\mathcal{O}$-module $\mathcal{I}$ the restriction mapping $\mathcal{I}(U) \to \mathcal{I}(U')$ is surjective.
Proof. Let $j : \mathcal{C}/U \to \mathcal{C}$ and $j' : \mathcal{C}/U' \to \mathcal{C}$ be the localization morphisms (Modules on Sites, Section 18.19). Since $j_!$ is a left adjoint to restriction we see that for any sheaf $\mathcal{F}$ of $\mathcal{O}$-modules
\[ \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _\mathcal {O}(j_!\mathcal{O}_ U, \mathcal{F}) = \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{\mathcal{O}_ U}(\mathcal{O}_ U, \mathcal{F}|_ U) = \mathcal{F}(U) \]
Similarly, the sheaf $j'_!\mathcal{O}_{U'}$ represents the functor $\mathcal{F} \mapsto \mathcal{F}(U')$. Moreover below we describe a canonical map of $\mathcal{O}$-modules
\[ j'_!\mathcal{O}_{U'} \longrightarrow j_!\mathcal{O}_ U \]
which corresponds to the restriction mapping $\mathcal{F}(U) \to \mathcal{F}(U')$ via Yoneda's lemma (Categories, Lemma 4.3.5). It suffices to prove the displayed map of modules is injective, see Homology, Lemma 12.27.2.
To construct our map it suffices to construct a map between the presheaves which assign to an object $V$ of $\mathcal{C}$ the $\mathcal{O}(V)$-module
\[ \bigoplus \nolimits _{\varphi ' \in \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _\mathcal {C}(V, U')} \mathcal{O}(V) \quad \text{and}\quad \bigoplus \nolimits _{\varphi \in \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _\mathcal {C}(V, U)} \mathcal{O}(V) \]
see Modules on Sites, Lemma 18.19.2. We take the map which maps the summand corresponding to $\varphi '$ to the summand corresponding to $\varphi = a \circ \varphi '$ by the identity map on $\mathcal{O}(V)$. As $a$ is a monomorphism, this map is injective. As sheafification is exact, the result follows. $\square$
Post a comment
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).
All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Comments (0)