Lemma 29.36.18. Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes over $S$. If $X$ and $Y$ are étale over $S$, then $f$ is étale.
Cancellation law for étale morphisms
Proof.
As a first proof one may reduce to the affine case and then use Algebra, Lemma 10.143.8. This proof is somewhat complicated as it uses the “Critère de platitude par fibres” to see that a morphism $X \to Y$ over $S$ between schemes étale over $S$ is automatically flat.
We give a second proof using the graph argument. Namely, consider the factorization $X \to X \times _ S Y \to Y$, where the first arrow is given by $\text{id}_ X$ and $f$ and the second arrow is the projection. We claim both arrows are étale and hence $f$ is étale by Lemma 29.36.3. Namely, the projection is étale as it is the base change of $X \to S$, see Lemma 29.36.4. The first arrow is the base change of the diagonal morphism $Y \to Y \times _ S Y$ because the square
is cartesian. The diagonal $Y \to Y \times _ S Y$ is an open immersion because $Y \to S$ is étale and hence unramified (Lemma 29.36.5) and we may use Lemma 29.35.13. The base change of an open immersion is an open immersion (Schemes, Lemma 26.18.2) and an open immersion is étale (Lemma 29.36.9). This finishes the second proof.
$\square$
Post a comment
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$
). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).
All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Comments (7)
Comment #3037 by Brian Lawrence on
Comment #3146 by Johan on
Comment #4953 by awllower on
Comment #4971 by Floris Ruijter on
Comment #5209 by Johan on
Comment #8251 by DatPham on
Comment #8894 by Stacks project on
There are also: