The Stacks project

Lemma 10.97.1. Let $I$ be an ideal of a Noetherian ring $R$. Denote ${}^\wedge $ completion with respect to $I$.

  1. If $K \to N$ is an injective map of finite $R$-modules, then the map on completions $K^\wedge \to N^\wedge $ is injective.

  2. If $0 \to K \to N \to M \to 0$ is a short exact sequence of finite $R$-modules, then $0 \to K^\wedge \to N^\wedge \to M^\wedge \to 0$ is a short exact sequence.

  3. If $M$ is a finite $R$-module, then $M^\wedge = M \otimes _ R R^\wedge $.

Proof. Setting $M = N/K$ we find that part (1) follows from part (2). Let $0 \to K \to N \to M \to 0$ be as in (2). For each $n$ we get the short exact sequence

\[ 0 \to K/(I^ nN \cap K) \to N/I^ nN \to M/I^ nM \to 0. \]

By Lemma 10.87.1 we obtain the exact sequence

\[ 0 \to \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits K/(I^ nN \cap K) \to N^\wedge \to M^\wedge \to 0. \]

By the Artin-Rees Lemma 10.51.2 we may choose $c$ such that $I^ nK \subset I^ n N \cap K \subset I^{n-c} K$ for $n \geq c$. Hence $K^\wedge = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits K/I^ nK = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits K/(I^ nN \cap K)$ and we conclude that (2) is true.

Let $M$ be as in (3) and let $0 \to K \to R^{\oplus t} \to M \to 0$ be a presentation of $M$. We get a commutative diagram

\[ \xymatrix{ & K \otimes _ R R^\wedge \ar[r] \ar[d] & R^{\oplus t} \otimes _ R R^\wedge \ar[r] \ar[d] & M \otimes _ R R^\wedge \ar[r] \ar[d] & 0 \\ 0 \ar[r] & K^\wedge \ar[r] & (R^{\oplus t})^\wedge \ar[r] & M^\wedge \ar[r] & 0 } \]

The top row is exact, see Section 10.39. The bottom row is exact by part (2). By Lemma 10.96.1 the vertical arrows are surjective. The middle vertical arrow is an isomorphism. We conclude (3) holds by the Snake Lemma 10.4.1. $\square$

Comments (6)

Comment #2979 by Kestutis Cesnavicius on

The statement of this lemma could be improved: completions are taken with respect to what? Similar remarks apply to the statements of the next several lemmas in this section.

Comment #3278 by Nicolas on

There's a typo in the statement of the lemma: it should be "Let I be an ideal".

Comment #8753 by Maozhou Huang on

In the proof of (3), to apply 0315, we need to show that is finite. This seems true because is a Noetherian module ( is Noetherian). Am I correct?

There are also:

  • 5 comment(s) on Section 10.97: Completion for Noetherian rings

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 00MA. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.



View Lemma 10.97.1 as pdf