The Stacks project

87.36 Colimits of formal algebraic spaces

In this section we generalize the result of Section 87.13 to the case of systems of morphisms of formal algebraic spaces. We remark that in the lemmas below the condition “$f_{\lambda \mu } : X_\lambda \to X_\mu $ is a closed immersion inducing an isomorphism $X_{\lambda , red} \to X_{\mu , red}$” can be reformulated as “$f_{\lambda \mu }$ is representable and a thickening”.

Lemma 87.36.1. Let $S$ be a scheme. Suppose given a directed set $\Lambda $ and a system of affine formal algebraic spaces $(X_\lambda , f_{\lambda \mu })$ over $\Lambda $ where each $f_{\lambda \mu } : X_\lambda \to X_\mu $ is a closed immersion inducing an isomorphism $X_{\lambda , red} \to X_{\mu , red}$. Then $X = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _{\lambda \in \Lambda } X_\lambda $ is an affine formal algebraic space over $S$.

Proof. We may write $X_\lambda = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _{\omega \in \Omega _\lambda } X_{\lambda , \omega }$ as the colimit of affine schemes over a directed set $\Omega _\lambda $ such that the transition morphisms $X_{\lambda , \omega } \to X_{\lambda , \omega '}$ are thickenings. For each $\lambda , \mu \in \Lambda $ and $\omega \in \Omega _\lambda $, with $\mu \geq \lambda $ there exists an $\omega ' \in \Omega _\mu $ such that the morphism $X_{\lambda , \omega } \to X_\mu $ factors through $X_{\mu , \omega '}$, see Lemma 87.9.4. Then the morphism $X_{\lambda , \omega } \to X_{\mu , \omega '}$ is a closed immersion inducing an isomorphism on reductions and hence a thickening. Set $\Omega = \coprod _{\lambda \in \Lambda } \Omega _\lambda $ and say $(\lambda , \omega ) \leq (\mu , \omega ')$ if and only if $\lambda \leq \mu $ and $X_{\lambda , \omega } \to X_\mu $ factors through $X_{\mu , \omega '}$. It follows from the above that $\Omega $ is a directed set and that $X = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _{\lambda \in \Lambda } X_\lambda = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _{(\lambda , \omega ) \in \Omega } X_{\lambda , \omega }$. This finishes the proof. $\square$

Lemma 87.36.2. Let $S$ be a scheme. Suppose given a directed set $\Lambda $ and a system of formal algebraic spaces $(X_\lambda , f_{\lambda \mu })$ over $\Lambda $ where each $f_{\lambda \mu } : X_\lambda \to X_\mu $ is a closed immersion inducing an isomorphism $X_{\lambda , red} \to X_{\mu , red}$. Then $X = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _{\lambda \in \Lambda } X_\lambda $ is a formal algebraic space over $S$.

Proof. Since we take the colimit in the category of fppf sheaves, we see that $X$ is a sheaf. Choose and fix $\lambda \in \Lambda $. Choose a covering $\{ X_{i, \lambda } \to X_\lambda \} $ as in Definition 87.11.1. In particular, we see that $\{ X_{i, \lambda , red} \to X_{\lambda , red}\} $ is an étale covering by affine schemes. For each $\mu \geq \lambda $ there exists a cartesian diagram

\[ \xymatrix{ X_{i, \lambda } \ar[r] \ar[d] & X_{i, \mu } \ar[d] \\ X_\lambda \ar[r] & X_\mu } \]

with étale vertical arrows. Namely, the étale morphism $X_{i, \lambda , red} \to X_{\lambda , red} = X_{\mu , red}$ corresponds to an étale morphism $X_{i, \mu } \to X_\mu $ of formal algebraic spaces with $X_{i, \mu }$ an affine formal algebraic space, see Lemma 87.34.4. The same lemma implies the base change of $X_{i, \mu }$ to $X_\lambda $ agrees with $X_{i, \lambda }$. It also follows that $X_{i, \mu } = X_\mu \times _{X_{\mu '}} X_{i, \mu '}$ for $\mu ' \geq \mu \geq \lambda $. Set $X_ i = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits X_{i, \mu }$. Then $X_{i, \mu } = X_ i \times _ X X_\mu $ (as functors). Since any morphism $T \to X = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits X_\mu $ from an affine (or quasi-compact) scheme $T$ maps into $X_\mu $ for some $\mu $, we see conclude that $\mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits X_{i, \mu } \to \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits X_\mu $ is étale. Thus, if we can show that $\mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits X_{i, \mu }$ is an affine formal algebraic space, then the lemma holds. Note that the morphisms $X_{i, \mu } \to X_{i, \mu '}$ are closed immersions as a base change of the closed immersion $X_\mu \to X_{\mu '}$. Finally, the morphism $X_{i, \mu , red} \to X_{i, \mu ', red}$ is an isomorphism as $X_{\mu , red} \to X_{\mu ', red}$ is an isomorphism. Hence this reduces us to the case discussed in Lemma 87.36.1. $\square$


Comments (0)


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0GVL. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.