The Stacks project

Lemma 36.4.4. Let $X$ be a quasi-separated and quasi-compact scheme. For any object $K$ of $D_\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X)$ the spectral sequence

\[ E_2^{i, j} = H^ i(X, H^ j(K)) \Rightarrow H^{i + j}(X, K) \]

of Cohomology, Example 20.29.3 is bounded and converges.

Proof. By the construction of the spectral sequence via Cohomology, Lemma 20.29.1 using the filtration given by $\tau _{\leq -p}K$, we see that suffices to show that given $n \in \mathbf{Z}$ we have

\[ H^ n(X, \tau _{\leq -p}K) = 0 \text{ for } p \gg 0 \]

and

\[ H^ n(X, K) = H^ n(X, \tau _{\leq -p}K) \text{ for } p \ll 0 \]

The first follows from Lemma 36.3.4 applied with $F = \Gamma (X, -)$ and the bound in Cohomology of Schemes, Lemma 30.4.5. The second holds whenever $-p \leq n$ for any ringed space $(X, \mathcal{O}_ X)$ and any $K \in D(\mathcal{O}_ X)$. $\square$

Comments (0)

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0G9Q. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.



View Lemma 36.4.4 as pdf