Let $(\mathcal{C}, \mathcal{O})$ be a ringed site. Let $(\mathcal{A}, \text{d})$ be a sheaf of differential graded algebras on $(\mathcal{C}, \mathcal{O})$. Consider the functor $\textit{Mod}(\mathcal{A}, \text{d}) \to K(\textit{Mod}(\mathcal{A}, \text{d}))$. This functor is not a $\delta $-functor in general. However, it turns out that the functor $\textit{Mod}(\mathcal{A}, \text{d}) \to D(A, \text{d})$ is a $\delta $-functor. In order to see this we have to define the morphisms $\delta $ associated to a short exact sequence
in the abelian category $\textit{Mod}(\mathcal{A}, \text{d})$. Consider the cone $C(a)$ of the morphism $a$ together with its canonical morphisms $i : \mathcal{L} \to C(a)$ and $p : C(a) \to \mathcal{K}[1]$, see Definition 24.22.2. There is a homomorphism of differential graded $\mathcal{A}$-modules
by Differential Graded Algebra, Lemma 22.27.3 (which we may use by the discussion in Section 24.22) applied to the diagram
The map $q$ is a quasi-isomorphism for example because this is true in the category of morphisms of complexes of $\mathcal{O}$-modules, see discussion in Derived Categories, Section 13.12. According to Differential Graded Algebra, Lemma 22.27.13 (which we may use by the discussion in Section 24.22) the triangle
is a distinguished triangle in $K(\textit{Mod}(\mathcal{A}, \text{d}))$. As the localization functor $K(\textit{Mod}(\mathcal{A}, \text{d})) \to D(\mathcal{A}, \text{d})$ is exact we see that $(\mathcal{K}, \mathcal{L}, C(a), a, i, -p)$ is a distinguished triangle in $D(\mathcal{A}, \text{d})$. Since $q$ is a quasi-isomorphism we see that $q$ is an isomorphism in $D(\mathcal{A}, \text{d})$. Hence we deduce that
is a distinguished triangle of $D(\mathcal{A}, \text{d})$. This suggests the following lemma.
Lemma 24.27.1. Let $(\mathcal{C}, \mathcal{O})$ be a ringed site. Let $(\mathcal{A}, \text{d})$ be a sheaf of differential graded algebras on $(\mathcal{C}, \mathcal{O})$. The localization functor $\textit{Mod}(\mathcal{A}, \text{d}) \to D(\mathcal{A}, \text{d})$ has the natural structure of a $\delta $-functor, with with $p$ and $q$ as explained above.
\[ \delta _{\mathcal{K} \to \mathcal{L} \to \mathcal{M}} = - p \circ q^{-1} \]
Proof. We have already seen that this choice leads to a distinguished triangle whenever given a short exact sequence of complexes. We have to show functoriality of this construction, see Derived Categories, Definition 13.3.6. This follows from Differential Graded Algebra, Lemma 22.27.3 (which we may use by the discussion in Section 24.22) with a bit of work. Compare with Derived Categories, Lemma 13.12.1. $\square$
Lemma 24.27.2. Let $(\mathcal{C}, \mathcal{O})$ be a ringed site. Let $(\mathcal{A}, \text{d})$ be a sheaf of differential graded algebras on $(\mathcal{C}, \mathcal{O})$. Let $\mathcal{M}_ n$ be a system of differential graded $\mathcal{A}$-modules. Then the derived colimit $\text{hocolim} \mathcal{M}_ n$ in $D(\mathcal{A}, \text{d})$ is represented by the differential graded module $\mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits \mathcal{M}_ n$.
Proof. Set $\mathcal{M} = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits \mathcal{M}_ n$. We have an exact sequence of differential graded $\mathcal{A}$-modules
by Derived Categories, Lemma 13.33.6 (applied the underlying complexes of $\mathcal{O}$-modules). The direct sums are direct sums in $D(\mathcal{A}, \text{d})$ by Lemma 24.26.8. Thus the result follows from the definition of derived colimits in Derived Categories, Definition 13.33.1 and the fact that a short exact sequence of complexes gives a distinguished triangle (Lemma 24.27.1). $\square$
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).
All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Comments (0)