Proposition 59.107.2. Let $p$ be a prime number. Let $S$ be a quasi-compact and quasi-separated scheme over $\mathbf{F}_ p$. Then
Here on the left hand side by $\mathcal{O}^ h$ we mean the h sheafification of the structure sheaf.
Proposition 59.107.2. Let $p$ be a prime number. Let $S$ be a quasi-compact and quasi-separated scheme over $\mathbf{F}_ p$. Then
Here on the left hand side by $\mathcal{O}^ h$ we mean the h sheafification of the structure sheaf.
Proof. This is just a reformulation of Lemma 59.107.1. Recall that $\mathcal{O}^ h = \mathcal{O}^{perf} = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _ F \mathcal{O}$, see More on Flatness, Lemma 38.38.7. By Lemma 59.107.1 we see that $\mathcal{O}^{perf}$ viewed as an object of $D((\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf})$ is of the form $R\epsilon _*K$ for some $K \in D((\mathit{Sch}/S)_ h)$. Then $K = \epsilon ^{-1}\mathcal{O}^{perf}$ which is actually equal to $\mathcal{O}^{perf}$ because $\mathcal{O}^{perf}$ is an h sheaf. See Cohomology on Sites, Section 21.27. Hence $R\epsilon _*\mathcal{O}^{perf} = \mathcal{O}^{perf}$ (with apologies for the confusing notation). Thus the lemma now follows from Leray
and the fact that
as $S$ is quasi-compact and quasi-separated (see proof of Lemma 59.107.1). $\square$
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$
). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).
All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Comments (0)