The Stacks project

47.19 Dualizing modules

If $(A, \mathfrak m, \kappa )$ is a Noetherian local ring and $\omega _ A^\bullet $ is a normalized dualizing complex, then we say the module $\omega _ A = H^{-\dim (A)}(\omega _ A^\bullet )$, described in Lemma 47.17.5, is a dualizing module for $A$. This module is a canonical module of $A$. It seems generally agreed upon to define a canonical module for a Noetherian local ring $(A, \mathfrak m, \kappa )$ to be a finite $A$-module $K$ such that

\[ \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _ A(K, E) \cong H^{\dim (A)}_\mathfrak m(A) \]

where $E$ is an injective hull of the residue field. A dualizing module is canonical because

\[ \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _ A(H^{\dim (A)}_\mathfrak m(A), E) = (\omega _ A)^\wedge \]

by Lemma 47.18.4 and hence applying $\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _ A(-, E)$ we get

\begin{align*} \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _ A(\omega _ A, E) & = \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _ A((\omega _ A)^\wedge , E) \\ & = \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _ A(\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _ A(H^{\dim (A)}_\mathfrak m(A), E), E) \\ & = H^{\dim (A)}_\mathfrak m(A) \end{align*}

the first equality because $E$ is $\mathfrak m$-power torsion, the second by the above, and the third by Matlis duality (Proposition 47.7.8). The utility of the definition of a canonical module given above lies in the fact that it makes sense even if $A$ does not have a dualizing complex.


Comments (0)


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0DW3. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.