Lemma 20.54.3. Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of ringed spaces. Let $E \in D(\mathcal{O}_ X)$ and $K \in D(\mathcal{O}_ Y)$. If $K$ is perfect, then
in $D(\mathcal{O}_ Y)$.
Lemma 20.54.3. Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of ringed spaces. Let $E \in D(\mathcal{O}_ X)$ and $K \in D(\mathcal{O}_ Y)$. If $K$ is perfect, then
in $D(\mathcal{O}_ Y)$.
Proof. To check (20.54.2.1) is an isomorphism we may work locally on $Y$, i.e., we have to find an open covering $\{ V_ j \to Y\} $ such that the map restricts to an isomorphism on $V_ j$. By definition of perfect objects, this means we may assume $K$ is represented by a strictly perfect complex of $\mathcal{O}_ Y$-modules. Note that, completely generally, the statement is true for $K = K_1 \oplus K_2$, if and only if the statement is true for $K_1$ and $K_2$. Hence we may assume $K$ is a finite complex of finite free $\mathcal{O}_ Y$-modules. In this case a simple argument involving stupid truncations reduces the statement to the case where $K$ is represented by a finite free $\mathcal{O}_ Y$-module. Since the statement is invariant under finite direct summands in the $K$ variable, we conclude it suffices to prove it for $K = \mathcal{O}_ Y[n]$ in which case it is trivial. $\square$
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$
). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).
All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Comments (0)