The Stacks project

Lemma 31.12.5. Let $X$ be an integral locally Noetherian scheme. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a coherent $\mathcal{O}_ X$-module. The following are equivalent

  1. $\mathcal{F}$ is reflexive,

  2. $\mathcal{F}_ x$ is a reflexive $\mathcal{O}_{X, x}$-module for all $x \in X$,

  3. $\mathcal{F}_ x$ is a reflexive $\mathcal{O}_{X, x}$-module for all closed points $x \in X$.

Proof. By Modules, Lemma 17.22.4 we see that (1) and (2) are equivalent. Since every point of $X$ specializes to a closed point (Properties, Lemma 28.5.9) we see that (2) and (3) are equivalent. $\square$

Comments (0)

There are also:

  • 2 comment(s) on Section 31.12: Reflexive modules

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0AY3. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.



View Lemma 31.12.5 as pdf