The Stacks project

Remark 22.37.10. Let $R$ be a ring. Let $(A, \text{d})$ and $(B, \text{d})$ be differential graded $R$-algebras which are derived equivalent, i.e., such that there exists an $R$-linear equivalence $D(A, \text{d}) \to D(B, \text{d})$ of triangulated categories. We would like to show that certain invariants of $(A, \text{d})$ and $(B, \text{d})$ coincide. In many situations one has more control of the situation. For example, it may happen that there is an equivalence of the form

\[ - \otimes _ A \Omega : D(A, \text{d}) \longrightarrow D(B, \text{d}) \]

for some differential graded $(A, B)$-bimodule $\Omega $ (this happens in the situation of Proposition 22.37.6 and is often true if the equivalence comes from a geometric construction). If also the quasi-inverse of our functor is given as

\[ - \otimes _ B^\mathbf {L} \Omega ' : D(B, \text{d}) \longrightarrow D(A, \text{d}) \]

for a differential graded $(B, A)$-bimodule $\Omega '$ (and as before such a module $\Omega '$ often exists in practice). In this case we can consider the functor

\[ D(A^{opp} \otimes _ R A, \text{d}) \longrightarrow D(B^{opp} \otimes _ R B, \text{d}),\quad M \longmapsto \Omega ' \otimes ^\mathbf {L}_ A M \otimes _ A^\mathbf {L} \Omega \]

on derived categories of bimodules (use Lemma 22.28.3 to turn bimodules into right modules). Observe that this functor sends the $(A, A)$-bimodule $A$ to the $(B, B)$-bimodule $B$. Under suitable conditions (e.g., flatness of $A$, $B$, $\Omega $ over $R$, etc) this functor will be an equivalence as well. If this is the case, then it follows that we have isomorphisms of Hochschild cohomology groups

\[ HH^ i(A, \text{d}) = \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{D(A^{opp} \otimes _ R A, \text{d})}(A, A[i]) \longrightarrow \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{D(B^{opp} \otimes _ R B, \text{d})}(B, B[i]) = HH^ i(B, \text{d}). \]

For example, if $A = H^0(A)$, then $HH^0(A, \text{d})$ is equal to the center of $A$, and this gives a conceptual proof of the result mentioned in Remark 22.37.9. If we ever need this remark we will provide a precise statement with a detailed proof here.

Comments (0)

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 09ST. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.



View Remark 22.37.10 as pdf