Lemma 21.45.5. Let $(\mathcal{C}, \mathcal{O})$ be a ringed site. Let $K, L$ be objects of $D(\mathcal{O})$.
If $K$ is $n$-pseudo-coherent and $H^ i(K) = 0$ for $i > a$ and $L$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent and $H^ j(L) = 0$ for $j > b$, then $K \otimes _\mathcal {O}^\mathbf {L} L$ is $t$-pseudo-coherent with $t = \max (m + a, n + b)$.
If $K$ and $L$ are pseudo-coherent, then $K \otimes _\mathcal {O}^\mathbf {L} L$ is pseudo-coherent.
Proof. Proof of (1). Let $U$ be an object of $\mathcal{C}$. By replacing $U$ by the members of a covering and replacing $\mathcal{C}$ by the localization $\mathcal{C}/U$ we may assume there exist strictly perfect complexes $\mathcal{K}^\bullet $ and $\mathcal{L}^\bullet $ and maps $\alpha : \mathcal{K}^\bullet \to K$ and $\beta : \mathcal{L}^\bullet \to L$ with $H^ i(\alpha )$ and isomorphism for $i > n$ and surjective for $i = n$ and with $H^ i(\beta )$ and isomorphism for $i > m$ and surjective for $i = m$. Then the map
induces isomorphisms on cohomology sheaves in degree $i$ for $i > t$ and a surjection for $i = t$. This follows from the spectral sequence of tors (details omitted).
Proof of (2). Let $U$ be an object of $\mathcal{C}$. We may first replace $U$ by the members of a covering and $\mathcal{C}$ by the localization $\mathcal{C}/U$ to reduce to the case that $K$ and $L$ are bounded above. Then the statement follows immediately from case (1). $\square$
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).
All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Comments (0)