Lemma 61.12.3. Any étale covering and any Zariski covering is a pro-étale covering.
Proof. This follows from the corresponding result for fpqc coverings (Topologies, Lemma 34.9.7), Lemma 61.12.2, and the fact that an étale morphism is a weakly étale morphism, see More on Morphisms, Lemma 37.64.9. $\square$
Post a comment
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$
). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).
All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Comments (0)
There are also: