Lemma 90.7.4. In the situation above, $\widehat{\mathcal{F}}_\mathcal {I}(R)$ is equivalent to the category $\widehat{\mathcal{F}}(R)$.
Proof. An equivalence $\widehat{\mathcal{F}}_\mathcal {I}(R) \to \widehat{\mathcal{F}}(R)$ can be defined as follows. For each $n$, let $m(n)$ be the least $m$ that $I_ m \subset \mathfrak m_ R^ n$. Given an object $(\xi _ n, f_ n)$ of $\widehat{\mathcal{F}}_\mathcal {I}(R)$, let $\eta _ n$ be the pushforward of $\xi _{m(n)}$ along $R/I_{m(n)} \to R/\mathfrak m_ R^ n$. Let $g_ n : \eta _{n + 1} \to \eta _ n$ be the unique morphism of $\mathcal{F}$ lying over $R/\mathfrak m_ R^{n + 1} \to R/\mathfrak m_ R^ n$ such that
\[ \xymatrix{ \xi _{m(n + 1)} \ar[rrr]_{f_{m(n)} \circ \ldots \circ f_{m(n + 1) - 1}} \ar[d] & & & \xi _{m(n)} \ar[d] \\ \eta _{n + 1} \ar[rrr]^{g_ n} & & & \eta _ n } \]
commutes (existence and uniqueness is guaranteed by the axioms of a cofibred category). The functor $\widehat{\mathcal{F}}_\mathcal {I}(R) \to \widehat{\mathcal{F}}(R)$ sends $(\xi _ n, f_ n)$ to $(R, \eta _ n, g_ n)$. We omit the verification that this is indeed an equivalence of categories. $\square$
Post a comment
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).
All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Comments (0)