The Stacks project

Lemma 13.14.4. Assumptions and notation as in Situation 13.14.1. Let $s : X \to Y$ be an element of $S$.

  1. $RF$ is defined at $X$ if and only if it is defined at $Y$. In this case the map $RF(s) : RF(X) \to RF(Y)$ between values is an isomorphism.

  2. $LF$ is defined at $X$ if and only if it is defined at $Y$. In this case the map $LF(s) : LF(X) \to LF(Y)$ between values is an isomorphism.

Proof. Omitted. $\square$


Comments (1)

Comment #9831 by on

Here's the proof: The result follows from Categories, Lemma 4.17.2 applied to the observation that the functor , sending an object to an object , is cofinal. To show that is cofinal, we check the conditions of #9830. Suppose is an object of . Then there are morphisms such that the square commutes and is in . Since is saturated, also lies in . On the other hand, suppose we have a commutative diagram Since is filtered, there is a morphism coequalizing and such that the composite lies in . Since is saturated, lies also in , thus is an object in and we win.

There are also:

  • 4 comment(s) on Section 13.14: Derived functors in general

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 05SB. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.