The Stacks project

Lemma 31.5.7. Let $X$ be a scheme. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_ X$-module. Let $x \in \text{Supp}(\mathcal{F})$ be a point in the support of $\mathcal{F}$ which is not a specialization of another point of $\text{Supp}(\mathcal{F})$. Then $x \in \text{WeakAss}(\mathcal{F})$. In particular, any generic point of an irreducible component of $X$ is weakly associated to $\mathcal{O}_ X$.

Proof. Since $x \in \text{Supp}(\mathcal{F})$ the module $\mathcal{F}_ x$ is not zero. Hence $\text{WeakAss}(\mathcal{F}_ x) \subset \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\mathcal{O}_{X, x})$ is nonempty by Algebra, Lemma 10.66.5. On the other hand, by assumption $\text{Supp}(\mathcal{F}_ x) = \{ \mathfrak m_ x\} $. Since $\text{WeakAss}(\mathcal{F}_ x) \subset \text{Supp}(\mathcal{F}_ x)$ (Algebra, Lemma 10.66.6) we see that $\mathfrak m_ x$ is weakly associated to $\mathcal{F}_ x$ and we win. $\square$

Comments (0)

There are also:

  • 4 comment(s) on Section 31.5: Weakly associated points

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 05AQ. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.



View Lemma 31.5.7 as pdf