Lemma 100.4.1. The notion above does indeed define an equivalence relation on morphisms from spectra of fields into the algebraic stack $\mathcal{X}$.
Proof. It is clear that the relation is reflexive and symmetric. Hence we have to prove that it is transitive. This comes down to the following: Given a diagram
with both squares $2$-commutative we have to show that $p$ is equivalent to $p'$. By the $2$-Yoneda lemma (see Algebraic Stacks, Section 94.5) the morphisms $p$, $p'$, and $q$ are given by objects $x$, $x'$, and $y$ in the fibre categories of $\mathcal{X}$ over $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(K)$, $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(K')$, and $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(L)$. The $2$-commutativity of the squares means that there are isomorphisms $\alpha : a^*x \to b^*y$ and $\alpha ' : (a')^*x' \to (b')^*y$ in the fibre categories of $\mathcal{X}$ over $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\Omega )$ and $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\Omega ')$. Choose any field $\Omega ''$ and embeddings $\Omega \to \Omega ''$ and $\Omega ' \to \Omega ''$ agreeing on $L$. Then we can extend the diagram above to
with commutative triangles and
is an isomorphism in the fibre category over $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\Omega '')$. Hence $p$ is equivalent to $p'$ as desired. $\square$
Post a comment
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$
). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).
All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Comments (0)
There are also: