The Stacks project

Lemma 110.23.1. Let $k$ be a field. There exists a variety $X$ whose normalization is quasi-affine but which is itself not quasi-affine.

Proof. See discussion above and (insert future reference on normalization here). $\square$

Comments (0)

There are also:

  • 2 comment(s) on Section 110.23: Non-quasi-affine variety with quasi-affine normalization

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0272. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.


View Lemma 110.23.1 as pdf