Proposition 7.39.3. Let $\mathcal{C}$ be a site. Assume that
finite limits exist in $\mathcal{C}$, and
every covering $\{ U_ i \to U\} _{i \in I}$ has a refinement by a finite covering of $\mathcal{C}$.
[Exposé VI, Appendix by Deligne, Proposition 9.0, SGA4]
Proposition 7.39.3. Let $\mathcal{C}$ be a site. Assume that
finite limits exist in $\mathcal{C}$, and
every covering $\{ U_ i \to U\} _{i \in I}$ has a refinement by a finite covering of $\mathcal{C}$.
Then $\mathcal{C}$ has enough points.
Proof. We have to show that given any sheaf $\mathcal{F}$ on $\mathcal{C}$, any $U \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C})$, and any distinct sections $s, s' \in \mathcal{F}(U)$, there exists a point $p$ such that $s, s'$ have distinct image in $\mathcal{F}_ p$. See Lemma 7.38.3. Consider the system $(J, \geq , V_ j, g_{jj'})$ with $J = \{ 1\} $, $V_1 = U$, $g_{11} = \text{id}_ U$. Apply Lemma 7.39.2. By the result of that lemma we get a system $(I, \geq , U_ i, f_{ii'})$ refining our system such that $s_ p \not= s'_ p$ and such that moreover for every finite covering $\{ W_ k \to W\} $ of the site $\mathcal{C}$ the map $\coprod _ k u(W_ k) \to u(W)$ is surjective. Since every covering of $\mathcal{C}$ can be refined by a finite covering we conclude that $\coprod _ k u(W_ k) \to u(W)$ is surjective for any covering $\{ W_ k \to W\} $ of the site $\mathcal{C}$. This implies that $u = p$ is a point, see Proposition 7.33.3 (and the discussion at the beginning of this section which guarantees that $u$ commutes with finite limits). $\square$
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$
). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).
All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Comments (3)
Comment #5087 by Anna on
Comment #5088 by Johan on
Comment #5298 by Johan on